In the Kingston cases, evidence suggested the device could be triggered by ambient air contaminants in the vehicle cabin (e.g., spilled coffee, air fresheners, or cleaning solvents), which the device would interpret as the driver being intoxicated.
The litigation highlighted that IID data is often presented in court as absolute truth, despite the devices not being evidential-grade breathalyzers (like those found in police stations), but rather screening devices with higher margins of error. draeger kingston
Periodic maintenance, structural inspections, and system calibrations. Impact on Regional and Industrial Safety In the Kingston cases, evidence suggested the device
The central argument in the Kingston litigation was that the Draeger Interlock 7000 lacked adequate "specificity"—the ability to distinguish between ethanol (beverage alcohol) and other interfering substances. In the Kingston cases